Review



test bacterial organisms  (ATCC)


Bioz Verified Symbol ATCC is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol ATCC manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 99
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    ATCC test bacterial organisms
    Test Bacterial Organisms, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 2302 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/test bacterial organisms/product/ATCC
    Average 99 stars, based on 2302 article reviews
    test bacterial organisms - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    99/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    test bacterial organisms  (ATCC)
    99
    ATCC test bacterial organisms
    Test Bacterial Organisms, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/test bacterial organisms/product/ATCC
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    test bacterial organisms - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    99/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    2014b bacterial test organisms serratia marcescens p87 y proteobacteria garbeva  (DSMZ)
    94
    DSMZ 2014b bacterial test organisms serratia marcescens p87 y proteobacteria garbeva
    2014b Bacterial Test Organisms Serratia Marcescens P87 Y Proteobacteria Garbeva, supplied by DSMZ, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/2014b bacterial test organisms serratia marcescens p87 y proteobacteria garbeva/product/DSMZ
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    2014b bacterial test organisms serratia marcescens p87 y proteobacteria garbeva - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    94/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    pm181104 against bacterial strains test organism mic  (ATCC)
    99
    ATCC pm181104 against bacterial strains test organism mic
    Pm181104 Against Bacterial Strains Test Organism Mic, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/pm181104 against bacterial strains test organism mic/product/ATCC
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    pm181104 against bacterial strains test organism mic - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    99/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    bacterial test organism s marcescens  (ATCC)
    96
    ATCC bacterial test organism s marcescens
    Log reductions of Serratia <t> marcescens </t> <xref ref-type= ∗ " width="250" height="auto" />
    Bacterial Test Organism S Marcescens, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/bacterial test organism s marcescens/product/ATCC
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    bacterial test organism s marcescens - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    96/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Log reductions of Serratia marcescens <xref ref-type= ∗ " width="100%" height="100%">

    Journal: American Journal of Infection Control

    Article Title: Comparative efficacy of hand hygiene agents in the reduction of bacteria and viruses

    doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2004.08.005

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Log reductions of Serratia marcescens ∗

    Article Snippet: The stock preparation of the bacterial test organism S marcescens (ATCC 14756) was stored frozen in skim milk at −80°C.

    Techniques: Control

    Efficacy of hand hygiene agents in the log reductions of gram-negative bacteria ( S marcescens ) after 1 episode, with 95% confidence intervals. Hand hygiene agents tested were as follows: (A) 60% ethyl alcohol (n = 5); (B) 61% ethyl alcohol (n = 5); (C) 62% ethyl alcohol (n = 5); (D) 61% ethyl alcohol/1% CHG (n = 5); (E) 70% ethyl alcohol/0.005% silver iodide (n = 5); (F) 0.4% benzalkonium chloride (n = 5); (G) 0.5% PCMX/40% SD alcohol (n = 5); (H) 0.75% chlorhexidine gluconate (n = 5); (I) 2% chlorhexidine gluconate (n = 5); (J) 4% chlorhexidine gluconate (n = 5); (K) 1% triclosan (n = 5); (L) 0.2% benzethonium chloride (n = 5); (M) nonantimicrobial control (n = 5); (N) tap water control (n = 5).

    Journal: American Journal of Infection Control

    Article Title: Comparative efficacy of hand hygiene agents in the reduction of bacteria and viruses

    doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2004.08.005

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Efficacy of hand hygiene agents in the log reductions of gram-negative bacteria ( S marcescens ) after 1 episode, with 95% confidence intervals. Hand hygiene agents tested were as follows: (A) 60% ethyl alcohol (n = 5); (B) 61% ethyl alcohol (n = 5); (C) 62% ethyl alcohol (n = 5); (D) 61% ethyl alcohol/1% CHG (n = 5); (E) 70% ethyl alcohol/0.005% silver iodide (n = 5); (F) 0.4% benzalkonium chloride (n = 5); (G) 0.5% PCMX/40% SD alcohol (n = 5); (H) 0.75% chlorhexidine gluconate (n = 5); (I) 2% chlorhexidine gluconate (n = 5); (J) 4% chlorhexidine gluconate (n = 5); (K) 1% triclosan (n = 5); (L) 0.2% benzethonium chloride (n = 5); (M) nonantimicrobial control (n = 5); (N) tap water control (n = 5).

    Article Snippet: The stock preparation of the bacterial test organism S marcescens (ATCC 14756) was stored frozen in skim milk at −80°C.

    Techniques: Bacteria, Control

    Efficacy of hand hygiene agents in the log reductions of gram-negative bacteria ( S marcescens ) after 10 episodes, with 95% confidence intervals. Hand hygiene agents tested were as follows: (A) 60% ethyl alcohol (n = 5); (B) 61% ethyl alcohol (n = 5); (C) 62% ethyl alcohol (n = 5); (D) 61% ethyl alcohol/1% CHG (n = 5); (E) 70% ethyl alcohol/0.005% silver iodide (n = 5); (F) 0.4% benzalkonium chloride (n = 5); (G) 0.5% PCMX/40% SD alcohol (n = 5); (H) 0.75% chlorhexidine gluconate (n = 5); (I) 2% chlorhexidine gluconate (n = 5); (J) 4% chlorhexidine gluconate (n = 5); (K) 1% triclosan (n = 5); (L) 0.2% benzethonium chloride (n = 5); (M) nonantimicrobial control (n = 5); (N) tap water control (n = 5).

    Journal: American Journal of Infection Control

    Article Title: Comparative efficacy of hand hygiene agents in the reduction of bacteria and viruses

    doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2004.08.005

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Efficacy of hand hygiene agents in the log reductions of gram-negative bacteria ( S marcescens ) after 10 episodes, with 95% confidence intervals. Hand hygiene agents tested were as follows: (A) 60% ethyl alcohol (n = 5); (B) 61% ethyl alcohol (n = 5); (C) 62% ethyl alcohol (n = 5); (D) 61% ethyl alcohol/1% CHG (n = 5); (E) 70% ethyl alcohol/0.005% silver iodide (n = 5); (F) 0.4% benzalkonium chloride (n = 5); (G) 0.5% PCMX/40% SD alcohol (n = 5); (H) 0.75% chlorhexidine gluconate (n = 5); (I) 2% chlorhexidine gluconate (n = 5); (J) 4% chlorhexidine gluconate (n = 5); (K) 1% triclosan (n = 5); (L) 0.2% benzethonium chloride (n = 5); (M) nonantimicrobial control (n = 5); (N) tap water control (n = 5).

    Article Snippet: The stock preparation of the bacterial test organism S marcescens (ATCC 14756) was stored frozen in skim milk at −80°C.

    Techniques: Bacteria, Control